Re: [ARSCLIST] TY vs Mitsui

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] TY vs Mitsui
From: Mike Richter <mrichter@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:06:36 -0700
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604251646560.19590@homer21.u.washington.edu>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <444EB98C.6070903@cpl.net>
References: <78C2C9E542FF3B4081FE589832A75CAA01B47FB7@sms1.sym.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604251646560.19590@homer21.u.washington.edu>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)

John Gibbs wrote:

I too use both TY and MAM-A and find that to get good results with MAM-A through the Clover analyzer, I must burn at a slower speed (4x max.).

Thanks for making the point. I recommend that judgement be based on using the optimal speed for each medium, then deciding on both quality and efficiency. For that reason, you might well find that for routine work (e.g., access copies) a high speed is worth a slightly higher error rate; for archival purposes, any improvement in quality is worth its price in recording time.

Mike
--
mrichter@xxxxxxx
http://www.mrichter.com/

References:
- [ARSCLIST] TY vs Mitsui
  - From: Ganesh . Irelan
- Re: [ARSCLIST] TY vs Mitsui
  - From: John Gibbs

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] TY vs Mitsui
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] ^ Medical grade CD-Rs
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] TY vs Mitsui
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] TY vs Mitsui
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] TY vs Mitsui

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]