Re: [ARSCLIST] Whacky Packia

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Whacky Packia
From: Lou Judson <inaudio@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:54:53 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=sbc01; d=pacbell.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=dOx2t8P9wvAWqwwOpdU1E9pN8dNXFRUs6V6q1ZAa5ZqhSlMcugvwDFpsH5UpkwPtm 0LV+G7aqPO89pKZb5OW2w==
In-reply-to: <43A1E784.16920.2DA1933@localhost>
Message-id: <26ab47bc151f63b7cfca068c1af8577d@pacbell.net>
References: <e18835fae5a3426a19bff0c21d4e580a@pacbell.net> <43A1E784.16920.2DA1933@localhost>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Hmm, I never thought of it as a way to get NEW Shakespeare works...

Lou Judson • Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Dec 15, 2005, at 1:00 PM, George Brock-Nannestad wrote:

Unless the monitor knew Shakespeare already he could not determine that it was actually by him. But then he did not need the monkeys to write it. And if he did not know Shakespeare, how would he, determine that it was yet another piece by him? Gamow mechanized the whole thing and used a very long wheel printer, just counting up slowly. He got the same results as the monkeys, only in a different and predictable order.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Whacky Packia
  - From: Russ Hamm
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Whacky Packia
  - From: stevenc

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Whacky Packia
  - From: Lou Judson
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Whacky Packia
  - From: George Brock-Nannestad

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] voice recognition software
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] voice recognition software
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Whacky Packia
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Whacky Packia
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Whacky Packia

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]