Re: [ARSCLIST] Disaster recovery- LPs

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Disaster recovery- LPs
From: Mike Richter <mrichter@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:20:46 -0700
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <006701c5c58c$72a66d10$6401a8c0@yourxhtr8hvc4p>
Message-id: <433CE74E.1020204@cpl.net>
References: <000e01c5c570$00821020$c85daf45@DELLDOWNSTAIRS> <433CB9A9.48C3DC75@sympatico.ca> <006701c5c58c$72a66d10$6401a8c0@yourxhtr8hvc4p>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

phillip holmes wrote:

So what's the prefered inner sleave for commercially produced LPs?

Apart from the issue of cost, I'd recommend Tyvek. Short of that, paper.

Mike
--
mrichter@xxxxxxx
http://www.mrichter.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Disaster recovery- LPs
  - From: phillip holmes

References:
- [ARSCLIST] Disaster recovery- LPs
  - From: Steven Smolian
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Disaster recovery- LPs
  - From: David Lennick
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Disaster recovery- LPs
  - From: phillip holmes