[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Restoration Software



I believe the presenter only tested broadband noise removal,
not click/pop/crackle removal.  The presenter's conclusion
will be less applicable to phonograph record restoration.



---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:56:12 -0500
>From: "joe@xxxxxxxxxxx" <sergei01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Restoration Software
>To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>I recall one of the presenters at the conference gave Waves the best overall
>rating in his evaluation. You may have missed that presenter.
>
>It really depends on your budget, doesn't it?
>
>Joe Salerno
>Video Works! Is it working for you?
>PO Box 273405 - Houston TX 77277-3405
>http://joe.salerno.com
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Brandon Burke" <burke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 5:47 PM
>Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Restoration Software
>
>
>> Kurt,
>>
>> I have had good luck with the Waves Restoration
>> Bundle.  [http://www.waves.com/content.asp?id=59]
>>
>> best,
>> -- Brandon
>>
>>
>> At 03:36 PM 4/27/2005, you wrote:
>> >Hello gang
>> >
>> >In your opinion, what software program (not outboard modules) does the
>best
>> >all-around job for restoring vintage recordings? I know that some of you
>> >use one package for one process and a different program for another, but
>> >what is the best over all?
>> >
>> >Kurt & Diane Nauck
>> >
>> >c/o Nauck's Vintage Records
>> >22004 Sherrod Ln.
>> >Spring, TX  77389
>> >
>> >Website: www.78rpm.com
>> >E-Mail: nauck@xxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> >Phone: (281) 288-7826
>> >Fax: (425) 930-6862
>>
>> _______________________________________
>> Brandon Burke
>> Archival Specialist
>> Hoover Institution Archives
>> Stanford University
>> Stanford, CA 94305-6010
>> voice: 650.724.9711
>> fax: 650.725.3445
>> email: burke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]