Re: [ARSCLIST] Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
From: Goran Finnberg <mastering@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:56:49 +0100
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
Message-id: <41EAB883.27F3@telia.com>
Organization: The Mastering Room AB
References: <yam9877.1205.155784816@smtp.ntlworld.com> <yam9877.1205.155784816@smtp.ntlworld.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20050116092127.00bf4d08@mail.cpl.net>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Mike Richter:

> with which
> the need for higher frequencies than the subject "can hear" is obvious.

http://world.std.com/~griesngr/intermod.ppt


--
Best,

Goran Finnberg
The Mastering Room AB
Goteborg
Sweden

E-mail: mastering@xxxxxxxxx

Learn from the mistakes of others, you can never live long enough to
make them all yourself.    -   John Luther

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
  - From: Alex Hartov

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
  - From: Don Cox
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
  - From: Mike Richter

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Sampling Theory (was Fred Layn's post on the Studer list re: Quantegy)

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]