[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] Is recording to Reel-to-reel still the preferred preservation method?
On 30/09/04, Parker Dinkins wrote:
> At least one study has shown that using a sample rate above 96kHz
> provides no benefit when used with well designed filtering, and in
> fact using 192 kHz results in reduced accuracy as well as unnecessary
> additional expense, both in storage and equipment requirements. See
> Dan Lavry's white paper on this topic at
>
> http://lavryengineering.com/documents/Sampling_Theory.pdf
It would probably be possible to "prove" that a 10x8 photograph is no
better than a 5x4 photograph. But it is.
Regards
--
Don Cox
doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx