Re: [ARSCLIST] Is recording to Reel-to-reel still the preferred preservation method?

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Is recording to Reel-to-reel still the preferred preservation method?
From: "Watsky, Lance" <lwatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:49:35 -0400
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
Message-id: <F78B885E330EC741B712FB995DCB961B013724E8@web1.sos.state.ga.us>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AcSmWZzo+D5CCEyDTYmdGm4ayBMA+AAAwdsQ
Thread-topic: [ARSCLIST] powder-like substance from open reel tapes

Hello Everyone:

I was wondering if 1/4" reel-to-reel is still considered the preferred method for creating preservation copies of audio recordings, or are we at a point now that we are actually better off using gold CD's?

Thanks,
Lance Watsky
Preservation & Media Specialist
The Georgia Archives
5800 Jonesboro Road
Morrow, GA 30260
678-364-3764 (phone)
678-364-3860 (fax)
lwatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.GeorgiaArchives.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Is recording to Reel-to-reel still the preferred preservation method?
  - From: David Lewiston
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Is recording to Reel-to-reel still the preferred preservation method?
  - From: Alyssa Ryvers

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] 14 inch recordings (was Victor Deluxe 12 discs
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Fw: [ARSCLIST] Gold CDs
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] 14 inch recordings (was Victor Deluxe 12 discs
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Is recording to Reel-to-reel still the preferred preservation method?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Is recording to Reel-to-reel still the preferred preservation method?

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]