Re: [ARSCLIST] Early bootlegs

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Early bootlegs
From: Dave Bradley <db65@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 12:32:35 -0400
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <NHBBKNHMCLCJJGLLJBIIIECFCAAA.roughrob@wobblyhead.com>
Message-id: <5.1.1.6.0.20040531123127.03017658@mail.netway.com>
References: <BCDD6B71.3C0E%bandmann@charter.net>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

It seems to me that these are the first bootlegs, but it leads me to ask
several questions:

Technically, wouldn't that be a pirate, not a bootleg?


-----------------
Diamond Productions
Specializing in analog tape preservation / restoration in the digital domain.
Dave Bradley   President

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Early bootlegs
  - From: Rob Sevier
- [ARSCLIST] ARSC Newsletter Deadlines
  - From: David Seubert

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Pre-Beta VST Plug-ins for Archival Audio
  - From: bandmann
- [ARSCLIST] Early bootlegs
  - From: Rob Sevier