Re: [ARSCLIST] Long-term/preservation audio (delayed)

[Steven Smolian <smolians@xxxxxxxxx>]

The conclusion is clear and universal.  Use what is least likely to oxidize,
especially products least vulnerable to exposure to excessive humidity.

Steve Smolian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Cox" <doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Long-term/preservation audio (delayed)


> On 28/07/03, stevenc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > However, I have a number of shellac 78's dating back into the 19th
> > century, and they show no signs of deterioration. Are there any
> > VERY-long-term issues as far as the lifespan of shellac records is
> > concerned, provided they are stored under reasonable care (and aren't
> > dropped)? Wouldn't metal also be likely to corrode or be otherwise
> > damaged?
>
> Depends on the metal. Gold lasts pretty well.
>
> Regards
> --
> Don Cox
> doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx