INTERPRETING ARTIST'S INTENT IN THE TREATMENT OF JOHN CONSTABLE'S THE WHITE HORSE SKETCH
MICHAEL SWICKLIK
REFERENCES
Clark, K.1946. Hogarth, Constable, and Turner. In Masterpieces of English painting. Chicago: Art Institute of Chicago. 14.
Cove, S.1991. Constable's oil painting materials and techniques. In Constable, ed.L.Parris and I. FlemingWilliams. London: Cross River Press. 493–521.
Hozee, R.1977. L'opera completa di Constable. Milan, Rizzoli. 149.
Rhyne, C. S.1990. Constable's first two six-foot landscapes. Studies in the History of Art 24. Washington, D. C.: National Gallery of Art, 112, 120.
Rhyne, C. S.1994. Deaccessioning John Constable. CAA abstracts, College Art Association Annual Meeting, New York. New York: CAA. 9–11.
Rhyne, C. S., and M.Swicklik. 1994. Intent in Constable's full size sketch for The White Horse. AIC preprints, American Institute for Conservation 22nd Annual Meeting, Nashville, Tenn. Washington, D.C.: AIC.
Taylor, B.1973. Constable: Paintings, drawings and watercolors. London: Phaidon.
Walker, J.1994. Letter to Herbert L. Satterlea, Curatorial files, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C..
AUTHOR INFORMATION
MICHAEL SWICKLIK received his M. A. in art conservation from the State University of New York, Cooperstown, in 1982. He has been a conservator of paintings at the National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., since 1984. His other publications concern the techniques of Van Dyck and the use of varnish by French painters. Address: 105 Woodlawn Rd., Baltimore, Md. 21210-2544.
|