[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] Is recording to Reel-to-reel still the preferred preservation method?
- To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Is recording to Reel-to-reel still the preferred preservation method?
- From: Angie at Avocado Productions <Angie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:47:30 -0500
- Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
- Message-id: <01C4A654.C9B0FE20@angie-office.@attbi.com>
- Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
That's my question, too.
Angie Dickinson
www.avocadoproductions.com
----------
From: Konrad Strauss
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 6:49 PM
To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Is recording to Reel-to-reel still the preferred preservation method?
on 9/29/04 5:04 PM, David Lewiston at david.lewiston@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 2. Digitising at 176.4kHz, 24 bits, and saving the digitised audio to two
Why 176.4kHz?
--
Konrad Strauss
Recording * Editing * Mastering * Production
http://php.indiana.edu/~kstrauss